Bibhu Mohapatra’s spring 2015 collection was a tribute to
heiress and activist
Nancy Cunard. In
addition to socializing with literary and artistic greats like
Ezra Pound, Ernest
Hemingway and
Man Ray, she was an accomplished publisher on her own. She led the fight against racism and fascism
as the new purpose in her life after falling in love with jazz musician
Henry
Crowder.
While the rebellious spirit of the socialite was a muse for
the designer, the aesthetics of the inspiration are a little more subtle. There were some 1920’s and 1930’s
silhouettes. The turban styled hair, the
bias pleat evening gowns had the glamour of madcap heiresses of old Hollywood movies. The oversized beaded
flower motifs paired with pale pink satin reminded me of Paul Poiret in the
decade before that.
The color palette
was stark, with black, ivory, pale blue and orange when it was mixed with a
geometric pattern. This wicker basket-like
print was interpreted in different scales and distorted across luxury fabrics. The softer rose and red colors were reserved
for the embroidered styles.
I don’t know why we don’t see his gowns on the red carpet
during awards season. They are so
beautiful and elegant. Each collection
has an artistic edge to them that many other collections just don’t achieve.
Bibhu Mohapatra’s star has risen quickly in recent seasons. Unfortunately, he seems to have attracted
unwanted attention too. Many
photographers were offended when they were thoroughly searched by security
before being allowed to shoot this show.
We were told by guards that the designer felt threatened.
Credentialed photographers have to send in their body of
work and assignments in order to be approved.
They have to show official forms of identification in order to pick up
their credentials, all of which have a photo and full name. Most have been photographing fashion week for
years. However, all sorts of random
guests who only need a barcode to gain entry to the show, with no
identification checked or required, carrying large handbags were all let into
the venue without a second glance.
Now, unless someone received a specific tip that a
credentialed photographer was the threat, why would you treat them like
criminals yet let all the strangers and random “fans” into the fashion
show? Of course, the fashion show guests
are generally better heeled (they don’t have to stand for 14 hours with 50 lbs.
of equipment on their shoulder). They
also have designer labels on their bags as opposed to bags that carry
professional gear. This was clearly a
case of class/style discrimination. If
you were a stalker who meant harm, which route would YOU take? Easy, random, unchecked guest ticket that you could buy on
Craigslist, or
spend years building up credentials to be a photographer? Also, will 99% of the world see your work from
photographs or in person at the show? Do
you really want to offend those who take and distribute those photographs?
Just a thought for the Bibhu Mohapatra PR team...
show photos by Mariana Leung
